Pick Greenlight Guru if you're a device-only team that wants deeper complaint handling, SOP templates and a published entry price. Pick Qualio if you also make drug or biologic products, want EU hosting by default, or care most about how easily non-quality staff pick it up.
These two are the closest pair in this category. Both are cloud eQMS products aimed at growing device companies of roughly 10 to 50 people, both link design controls to ISO 14971 risk, and both get high marks for ease of use and support.
Who each is built for
Greenlight Guru builds software only for medical device companies. Qualio sells to life sciences more broadly, with medical devices alongside pharma and biotech. If you also make a drug or biologic, Qualio has an advantage: deviations, OOS and pharmacovigilance sit in the same platform.
Price and contract terms
Greenlight Guru publishes an entry price: eQMS packages start at $12,000 a year, with implementation quoted separately. Buyers pay more than that. Vendr reports a median of $43,989 a year, and a 40-person company on Reddit reported about $30,000 in its first year.
Qualio publishes plans but no prices, and every plan carries an implementation fee that isn’t published either. Its archived pricing page showed annual plans from $12,000 in 2020 and $14,000 in 2021. So the entry points look similar, but with Qualio you only find out after a sales call.
On renewals, neither agreement caps increases. Greenlight Guru can raise fees at each renewal with 90 days’ notice. Qualio can set a new fee for each renewal term, and you can terminate with 30 days’ notice before your term ends if it does. One Qualio reviewer on Capterra reported a 2024 increase the vendor wouldn’t negotiate. On Greenlight Guru, users report the bill growing as the team grows; a current customer wrote in 2026 that “the cost is starting to hurt a bit.”
Exit terms favour Greenlight Guru slightly. It gives you 90 days after termination to request an export. Qualio gives 30 days, and only if you ask in writing before the end date. Qualio’s documented exports cover documents, training, events, suppliers and the audit trail in PDF, Word, XLSX and CSV, but design-control data isn’t on that list.
Product scope
Both cover design controls properly. Greenlight Guru’s tour shows a design control matrix linking user needs, inputs, outputs, verification and validation, with Jira and GitHub references on the cards. Qualio supports up to three requirement levels with V&V test cases and generates trace matrices. Jira is included in Qualio, but GitHub, GitLab and Azure DevOps need its paid Integration Hub add-on.
For software as a medical device, Greenlight Guru goes further: release management aligned to IEC 62304, plus SBOM scanning. Qualio’s design controls documentation doesn’t cover software safety classes, software items or SOUP lists.
Quality events differ more. Greenlight Guru has separate workspaces for CAPA, complaints, nonconformance and audits, and its complaint flow includes a reportability decision that creates a task to prepare the FDA report. Qualio runs these in a configurable Events module where you design the templates yourself; complaints appear only as an example template, and we found no FDA MDR or EU vigilance reporting. Neither documents UDI management or a device history record workflow, and neither submits eMDRs.
SOP templates are included in Greenlight Guru’s eQMS package. In Qualio they cost extra (Content Pathways).
Documents and usability
Greenlight Guru stores documents as files, and you co-author them in Google Docs or Microsoft Office for the web. Qualio has an in-app editor with co-editing. Several Qualio reviewers report that formatting, tables and landscape forms are harder than in Word.
Both rate well for ease of use and support on G2, with Qualio slightly ahead on ease of use and Greenlight Guru on support. On Reddit, consultants and former Greenlight Guru users report it working well early but becoming cumbersome with more product lines or manufacturing processes. Qualio reviewers on G2 report limited flexibility for non-standard processes.
Go-live and validation
Qualio’s rollout is more guided: an eight-week onboarding program with a dedicated onboarding manager. Greenlight Guru ships an IQ protocol and completed OQ and PQ reports with every release, included in the subscription. Qualio follows FDA’s Computer Software Assurance approach and provides a validation pack; it doesn’t say whether the pack costs extra.
Hosting
Qualio’s subprocessor list names one web-application host, AWS in Dublin. Greenlight Guru’s architecture overview, which dates from 2022, says data stays in one region set in the order form: the US, Germany, Singapore or Australia. EU buyers should confirm German hosting in writing. Qualio publishes a full data processing addendum; Greenlight Guru’s public one covers only its clinical product.
Choose Greenlight Guru if…
- you make only medical devices, especially software-driven ones that need IEC 62304-aligned releases and GitHub links without an add-on;
- you want dedicated complaint, nonconformance and audit workflows and a set of SOP templates on day one;
- you want to see an entry price before talking to sales, and can budget well above it.
Choose Qualio if…
- you make devices and drug or biologic products and want one system for both;
- adoption by non-quality staff is your main worry, and you prefer an in-app editor to Word files;
- you want EU hosting and a public DPA, and can configure complaint and nonconformance workflows yourself.