CompareMasterControl vs Matrix Requirements (Matrix One)

MasterControl vs Matrix Requirements (Matrix One): price, contract and features compared

Compare with .

MasterControl

Our score 5.3 / 10
Price Estimate

est. $25–72k/yr

Basic from $25k a year; Vendr contracts $72–117k

Choose it if: You run a larger, multi-site device or combined device-and-pharma quality organisation and need a configurable, validated system for documents, training, CAPA and audits.

Watch out: Prices, hosting location and exit terms aren't published, and design controls, risk files and software development support are weak for device R&D teams.

Matrix Requirements (Matrix One)

Higher score 7.5 / 10
Price Published

from $22k/yr

Matrix Req Team Plus + 10 Matrix Quality licences

Choose it if: You build software or software-heavy devices and need design controls, risk and test traceability tied to your QMS.

Watch out: A full QMS takes two products from Matrix One: Matrix Req, plus Matrix Quality, a Salesforce-based eQMS acquired in 2026 and priced separately.

Placeholder data: some scores, prices and features on this page have not been verified yet.

Side by side

MasterControl 5.3Matrix Requirements (Matrix One) 7.5
Price and buying
AffordabilityHow we score affordabilityEstimated yearly cost for a 10-person team, including required fees.4.0 est. $25–72k/yr Basic from $25k a year; Vendr contracts $72–117k5.5 from $22k/yr Matrix Req Team Plus + 10 Matrix Quality licences
Price transparencyHow we score price transparencyWhether the vendor publishes its prices on its own website.2.0 No public price Per-user prices published until 20199.0 Public price lists Enterprise Plus quote-based; no mandatory fees
Try before you buyHow we score try before you buyWhether you can try the product yourself before talking to sales.5.0 No free trial Recorded demos and live demo8.5 Free trial Self-serve for Matrix Req; Matrix Quality on request
Contract and lock-inHow we score contract and lock-inMinimum term, whether you can take all your data with you at no extra cost, and other lock-in risks.4.0 Term not published Auto-renews; exit file format unstated7.0 Annual Export to XML, Excel and PDF; REST API
EU data residencyHow we score eu data residencyWhether your data can be hosted in the EU, and how clearly that's documented.3.0 Not stated AWS, location 'Global'; public DPA and subprocessor list5.0 EU by customer location Matrix Req; no public DPA; Matrix Quality region undocumented
Budget predictabilityHow we score budget predictabilityHow well you can predict future bills: price-increase clauses, price history and the cost of adding users.5.0 Renews at then-current fees No cap in the terms; priced per named user7.0 No cap on price increases Matrix Req list prices up about 31% from 2023 to 2026
Product
Compliance coverageHow we score compliance coverageHow much of ISO 13485, FDA and EU MDR the system covers out of the box, based on its documentation.8.0 Validation tools included; ISO 270018.0 ISO 27001 (valid to Dec 2026), IQ/OQ/PQ package; no UDI or PMS features found
Design controls and traceabilityHow we score design controls and traceabilityHow well requirements, risks, tests and software lifecycle are linked, and whether the design history file is generated for you.2.5 Design and risk only as documents; no Jira or Git link found10.0 Documented traceability; Jira, Git and Azure DevOps links
UsabilityHow we score usabilityEase-of-use ratings from G2 or Capterra, adjusted for what users repeatedly report.8.0 4.1 / 5 on Capterra Ease of use, 540 reviews; G2 7.8/108.0 8.4 / 10 on G2 Weighted across both products; score capped at 8 (review drive)
Service
Support and onboardingHow we score support and onboardingSupport ratings from review sites, plus whether onboarding help is included in the price.8.0 4.5 / 5 on Capterra Customer service, 540 reviews; G2 8.6/108.0 9.4 / 10 on G2 Weighted across both products; score capped at 8 (review drive)
Community sentimentHow we score community sentimentOverall review-site rating, adjusted for what independent users say in communities.8.0 4.5/5 on Capterra (540 reviews); Reddit split8.0 4.3/5 (66 reviews) and 4.9/5 (18) on G2; capped at 8 (review drive)
Time to go liveHow we score time to go liveHow long it usually takes until your team can work in the system, and whether templates are included.6.0 About 90 days Vendor figure for the Qx Starter package6.5 1–3 months Vendor statements conflict; templates on Company plan

Scores are out of 10. The better side of each row is highlighted. How we score

Notable features

MasterControlMatrix Requirements (Matrix One)
Built-in document editorNot confirmed yetDocuments can come from any authoring tool; no documentation of a built-in editorYesRich-text editor for items and generated documents
Edit in Word or Google DocsPartly or add-onRoute files from any software; no documented Word or Google co-editingPartly or add-onMatrix Quality only (Office 365, SharePoint/Google); Matrix Req imports Word but can't edit in it
SOP templates includedPartly or add-onPreconfigured forms and workflows in Qx Starter; no SOP setYesSxMD SOP and document templates on Company plans
Jira or Git integrationNot confirmed yetNo Jira or Git integration foundYesJira, GitHub, GitLab and Azure DevOps
IEC 62304 software featuresNot confirmed yetNo IEC 62304 features foundYesSoftware traceability and IEC 62304 templates
Validation package includedYesVxT and Validation on Demand included; URS and TPQ in Qx StarterYesValidation project with plans, tests and reports
Public APIPartly or add-onAPI Toolkit (REST); documentation gatedYesDocumented REST API; Salesforce APIs for Matrix Quality
Single sign-on (SSO)YesOkta SSO for login; e-signature needs a separate passwordYesMatrix Req: Enterprise Plus only; Matrix Quality via Salesforce
Supplier portalPartly or add-onNon-users can access documents; suppliers can mark up BOMsYesMatrix Quality portal for supplier forms and SCARs
Training with quizzesYesRole-based exams; AI exam generatorYesMultiple-choice training questions in Matrix Req
FDA MDR or EU vigilance reportingPartly or add-oneMDR form with FDA XML claimed on product page; no EU vigilance foundPartly or add-onReportability assessment on a marketing page only
AI featuresYesDocument and event summaries, translation, SOP Analyzer; ISO 42001YesMatrix Mind, AI design tools, compliance checker
ISO 13485 clause coverage (17 requirements)
ClauseRequirementMasterControlMatrix Requirements (Matrix One)
4.2.4Control of documents
4.2.5Control of records
6.2Training and competence
7.3Design and development
7.3.9Change control
7.4Supplier qualification and control
7.5Production records (DMR/DHR)
UDIUDI management (EU MDR, FDA)
8.2.2Complaint handling
8.2.3Regulatory reporting (FDA MDR, EU vigilance)
MDR 83Post-market surveillance
8.2.4Internal audit
8.3Nonconforming product
8.5.2Corrective action (CAPA)
ISO 14971Risk management file
IEC 62304Software lifecycle
Part 11Electronic signatures
Supported out of the boxPartial, or needs an add-onNot supportedNot confirmed yet

MasterControl or Matrix Requirements (Matrix One)?

We haven't written a verdict for this pair yet. The comparison above comes from our research on each system; the full reviews explain each score.